Royal Ice Cream Sit-In 

By Dennis Daniels
Research Branch, NC Office of Archives and History, 2007
https://www.ncdcr.gov/about/history/division-historical-resources/nc-highway-historical-marker-program

 

Segregation protest at an ice cream parlor located at Roxboro and Dowd Streets in Durham, N.C., June 23, 1957, led to court case testing dual racial facilities.

The 1960 Greensboro sit-ins sparked a national movement but were not the first such action. Individual and group protest actions prior to 1960, generally isolated and often without wider impact, took place across the state and region. A protest in 1957 in Durham had wider consequence, as it led to a court case testing the legality of segregated facilities. The Royal Ice Cream Company had a doorway on the Dowd Street side with a “White Only” sign and, on Roxboro Street, a sign marked “Colored Only.” A partition separated the two sections inside the building. 

Royal Ice Cream advertisement, from the Carolina Times, August 16, 1958. Presented online at DigitalNC. Used in NCpedia for educational purposes.

On June 23, 1957, Rev. Douglas Moore, pastor of Asbury Temple Methodist Church, and six others assembled at the church to plan the protest. The young African Americans moved over to Royal Ice Cream and took up booths. When they refused to budge, the manager called the police who charged them with trespassing. Newspaper coverage in the Durham-Raleigh area was mixed. The Durham papers printed the story on the front-page the next day but it was buried inside the Raleigh News and Observer; The Carolinian, an African American newspaper, placed it on the front page. 

On June 24 the protestors were found guilty of trespassing and each fined $10 plus court costs. On appeal the case went to Superior Court and a jury trial. An all-white jury rendered a guilty verdict of trespass on each defendant. The case was appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court that upheld the law regarding segregated facilities. On July 15, 1958, the seven protesters paid fines totaling $433.25. Attorneys appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court but the High Court refused to hear the case. 

Update from N.C. Government & Heritage Library staff: 
The boycott and pickett protest campaign against Royal Ice Cream in Durham continued into the early 1960s. In 1962, as the Durham School Board began a plan for school desegregation, African American School Board member E. Eric Moore also protested a city contract that purchased ice cream for schools from the Royal Ice Cream Company.

References: 

Dennis Daniels, research report, 2002, North Carolina Office of Archives and History 

Durham County Superior Court Minute Docket, Vol. 45, 1956-1958, pages 310, 312, and 545 

North Carolina Reports 247 (Fall Term 1957 and Spring Term 1958): 455-462 

The Carolinian, June 29, 1957 

Durham Morning Herald, June 24, 1957; June 25, 1957; July 17, 1957; July 18, 1957; January 11, 1958; December 5, 1979; December 9, 1979; and January 13, 1980 

Durham Sun, June 24, 1957; July 17, 1957; and January 10, 1958 

Durham Herald-Sun, December 12, 2000 

News and Observer, June 25, 1957

Additional Resources and Images:

"Tempo of Drive On Ice Cream Co. Is Increased." The Carolina Times, December 15, 1962. http://newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn83045120/1962-12-15/ed-1/seq-1/

"Boycott Narrows to Five." The Carolina Times, April 1, 1961. http://newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn83045120/1961-04-01/ed-1/seq-1/

Images of the Royal Ice Cream building and protests, from OpenDurham. http://www.opendurham.org/buildings/royal-ice-cream-charlie-dunhams-unio... (accessed April 12, 2016).

Image Credits:

[Royal Ice Cream, advertisement]. Carolina Times, August 16, 1958. http://newspapers.digitalnc.org/lccn/sn83045120/1958-08-16/ed-1/seq-6/

Origin - location: 

Add a comment

PLEASE NOTE: NCpedia will not publish personal contact information in comments, questions, or responses. If you would like a reply by email, please note thats some email servers are blocked from accepting messages from outside email servers or domains. These often include student email addresses from public school email accounts. If you prefer not to leave an email address, check back at your NCpedia comment for a reply. Please allow one business day for replies from NCpedia. Complete guidelines are available at http://ncpedia.org/comments.